OK, call me dumb and crazy but somebody explain the economics of this tire to me. First of all, I asked the Honda dealer if they would mount a c/t on my 1800 rim and they told me NO...Flat, NO. I asked a tire and lube place here if they would and they told me NO... So, I assume its tricky trying to find someone to mount the tire. Second of all, in reading the fine print on the sticker on the tire it says in part. " Do not run over 50 mph and 50 miles ( 50 or 40 im not sure) if the tire loses air (puncture). Then comes the important part..."Do not re-inflate if the run-flat feature is used and do not repair the tire". So, if you run over a nail and the tire goes down, and you drive it to a shop, you have to buy a new tire. Cannot be repaired or re-inflated. Since I can't find anyone to mount a C/T I am assuming that if your out on a trip and run over something, you are going to have to buy a M/C tire to replace it anyway. That statement based on the fact that I can't find anyone to mount a C/T on a M/C rim. Now I realize that if you are lucky and don't run over anything and change the tire yourself, its a good deal. But any trouble with the tire while on a trip seems to me to be a justifiable cause for concern. I ran over a metal screw on the rear tire of my bike last year, got it off to the side of the rode, and plugged it, re-inflated it and drove it another 2 k miles before replacing. I don't see that this can be done with the tire above. Am I just being picky or what?